Doctors Without a Conscience
After all these many years of runaway costs, excessive malpractice, corporate indifference, consumer apathy and government impotence and complicity, the health care issue has been noticed by the AMA. After the failure in the 1990’s of the Clinton Administration’s flagship initiative on health care aggravated by the reluctance of Congress to offend lobbyists, the only health care reforms from Washington came in the form of more wasteful spending. Two of the most ridiculous examples would be adding Medicare coverage for nearly anyone to get a motorized chair and drugs for erectile dysfunction. With reports indicating most Americans are morbidly obese, defining it as a covered disease and authorizing millions of lypo-suctions and stomach staplings was the obvious next step. Now that everyone has lost their mind, the AMA is nervous about all this talk of universal heath care.
Have you even noticed that the major issues of the day are all centered around products or services that are not exactly discretionary. Three of those issues are health care, energy and education. And all three are subject to price increases that have found no real limit. Beyond having some self-discipline, so-called experts suggest on the one hand that we take a proactive, preventive stance on health care which requires regular, periodic use of services. Yet with energy we are encouraged to reduce our consumption and exercise all manner of conservation to save the environment and limit demand. And everyone knows the measurable elements of education continue to decline or at best remain flat while the same cannot be said of what it costs to provide that education.
So what better places are there for making a profit as a provider? Three examples were just mentioned where the market demand is nearly unlimited so the price increases are essentially automatic. This is one area in the ‘free market’ system where competition is meaningless as it has no effect on price nor quality. And the consumer does little to provide a positive influence on the situation. Bigger houses, bigger cars, undisciplined lifestyles and an apathy towards participation in the process only make matters worse.
But take heart folks because the AMA has got your back. Or at least that part of your back that houses your wallet. After all this time what possible reason could the AMA have for getting involved publicly on the issue of health care. Especially during a Presidential campaign, their surprising concern may lead to the conclusion that they are finally concerned that the medical kingdom may soon be under attack. Over the last few months every candidate for President has offered some form of health care plan. And the terms universal and health care have been spoken about too often for the AMA to remain comfortably silent. They are just protecting their own interests. They are quite confident you will not protect yours. And they are equally convinced all this talk about health care may finally cause them a problem. That is the only reason they would be willing to spend this much money for a campaign.
There is Doctors Without Borders and then there is Doctors WIthout A Conscience.
Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com
AMA Launches Multi-Million Dollar Campaign to Cover the Uninsured
First Phase of Three-Year Campaign to Focus on DC and Early Primary States
AMA Launches Multi-Million Dollar Campaign to Cover the Uninsured
WASHINGTON, Aug. 23 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Today, the American Medical Association (AMA) launches a three-year, multi-million dollar campaign called “Voice For The Uninsured” to spur action to cover the uninsured. The national launch begins today with a Washington, D.C. press conference at the National Press Club and full-page ads in the New York Times and USAToday.
This year, the AMA is reaching out to voters and candidates to talk about the problem of the uninsured and the AMA’s solution. The second year of the campaign will focus on influencing Americans to vote for president with the issue of the uninsured in mind. The third year, post-election, the AMA will urge members of Congress to pass legislation to cover all Americans.
“The AMA campaign is grounded in the sad fact that one in seven Americans is uninsured,” said AMA President-elect Nancy Nielsen, M.D. “That’s not just a statistic, it’s a tragedy. The campaign gives a voice to these 45 million uninsured patients who desperately need one.”
“The beginning of the AMA’s campaign will coincide with the 2008 election cycle,” said Dr. Nielsen. “As the 2008 presidential hopefuls develop their platforms for health care reform, the AMA is encouraging them to incorporate the AMA proposal into their plans to cover the uninsured.”
“Under the AMA plan, the vast majority of Americans would have the means to purchase health care coverage,” said Dr. Nielsen. “It would give individuals choices, so they can select the appropriate coverage for them and their families, and would promote market reforms in the insurance industry.”
This year the AMA launches a new website, http://www.voicefortheuninsured.org/, to allow patients to learn more about the AMA’s proposal to cover the uninsured, sign a petition, and share a personal story. From Labor Day through the end of this year, AMA ads will appear in various television, print, radio and online outlets in Washington, D.C. and the early primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.
Additional outreach in these markets includes ads on pharmacy bags, billboards and in transit stations. During September and December, the Metro Center station in Washington, D.C. will be blanketed with 100 ads.
“The Voice For The Uninsured campaign will rally physicians, mobilize patients, and amplify voters’ voices on the issue of the uninsured,” said Dr. Nielsen. “We’re personally reaching out to voters and candidates at events in early primary states.”
The AMA sponsored a day at the Iowa State Fair (8/16) and had a presence at the Iowa Straw Poll (8/11). Upcoming events include the New Hampshire Hopkinton State Fair (8/30) and Rochester Fair (9/14). The AMA Voice For The Uninsured campaign will also be at home football games at the University of South Carolina, Clemson University, the University of Iowa, and Iowa State University. AMA leaders will continue to share the AMA proposal through speaking engagements with various community, civic, and patient groups.
“The AMA is enlisting doctors and medical students in our campaign, and asking them to become advocates on this important issue,” said Dr. Nielsen. “When patients visit their doctor’s office they will be able to pick up materials on the AMA’s uninsured campaign.”
The AMA continues to advocate for the renewal of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Earlier this year, the AMA joined forces with a group of 16 national health care stakeholders to reach consensus on recommendations to cover the uninsured using some of the core principles of the AMA proposal.
“Covering the uninsured is a top priority for the AMA, and today we’re taking a big step forward in our commitment to cover all Americans,” said Dr. Nielsen.
For more information on the ads and the AMA plan to cover the uninsured visit: http://www.voicefortheuninsured.org/.
Website: http://www.voicefortheuninsured.org/
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/17712.html
Trackposted to third world county, Faultline USA, Woman Honor Thyself, Big Dog’s Weblog, Shadowscope, Nuke’s News & Views, Blue Star Chronicles, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, and Phastidio.net, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

August 25th, 2007 at 11:54 am
[…] University of Texas Doctors Without a Conscience » This Summary is from an article posted at Blog @ MoreWhat.com on Saturday, August 25, 2007 This article’s contents are copywritten by the author of Blog @ MoreWhat.com . Please click "View Original Article…" below to view the article. Summary Provided by Technorati.comView Original Article at Blog @ MoreWhat.com » 10 Most Recent News Articles About Iowa State University […]
August 25th, 2007 at 2:00 pm
[…] Wake Forest University Doctors Without a Conscience » This Summary is from an article posted at Blog @ MoreWhat.com on Saturday, August 25, 2007 This article’s contents are copywritten by the author of Blog @ MoreWhat.com . Please click "View Original Article…" below to view the article. Summary Provided by Technorati.comView Original Article at Blog @ MoreWhat.com » 10 Most Recent News Articles About Clemson University […]
August 25th, 2007 at 6:12 pm
I can tell you that the AMA does not speak for or represent the majority of doctors who work long hours helping people because it is their calling. Many doctors give of their own time, money, to help people, especially the elderly and children, who don’t have money for doctor visits or medications. They don’t have time to spend kissing politicians rear ends and participating in the AMA. Yes they should, but they are too busy taking care of people. A doctor spends around 10 years of his life doing nothing but study and learning how to provide his services to the masses. People have some strange idea of doctors as rolling in money, raking in evil greenbacks that they don’t deserve. It takes years just to work long enough to get your school expenses paid back and to provide for your family.
Should insurance be paying for Viagra and plastic surgery? No. The system needs revamping. But we do not need socialized medicine or a government program. Government screws things up worse than the private sector ever could. Just my opinion.
August 25th, 2007 at 8:04 pm
Hence, the last sentence of my post. Which is to say like any other group there is the good, the bad and the ugly.
August 26th, 2007 at 12:32 am
I am not entirely sure if I should be offended, but I’d like to share a few points.
I am a practicing physician, work about 70-80 hrs week and prior to this - went to school for 8 yrs, and received 7 yrs of training beyond that. That’s 15 yrs and over $200,000 of debt ($14000 interest/yr)- before I even started working. I would also point out - for many specialities - incomes for phyicians have not kept up with inflation. For example, there are nurses (such as ICU and ER nurses) who routinely make more money than some physicians. This is especially true for some primary care doctors or academics or if you break down salaries by hourly income.
But how about the insurance companies? The CEO of Wellpoint made over 20 million dollars last year. He and his top executives all received increases in base salary for their good work, made huge gains in profitability for the company(they made billions), but still felt it necessary to increase premiums to patients and reduce payments for physicians. The top executives of Wellpoint made well over 70 million dollars - in 2006 alone. And that was just one company.
Point being - the physicians, the patients, the nurses - we are all allies. We want all want good health. For me, it’s my job and my passion. The larger issue we all need to take notice is the “outsiders” who are slowly encroaching and are simply in business to make money off the pateints and the people who provide the care. They want their cut, and that cut is getting larger and larger every day.
August 26th, 2007 at 1:54 am
Another screed by an ignorant dope. Ye want health care now, health care perfect, health care free, while incentives to recruit the best and the brightest are demolished. The crisis is yet to arrive, it will be too late when ye figure it out.
August 26th, 2007 at 7:13 am
Much of the solution to soaring prices in health care is simply to force individual consumers to take responsibility for the cost of their own health care.
The surest way to do that is to get rid of the socialism of health care that comes from having a job or being on a government program like Medicare. It ought to be illegal for employers to offer direct health care benefits to their employees. Under today’s system of health insurance provided as a fringe benefit (an entitlement that many employees take totally for granted), few employees give adequate attention to how much health care they consume or what it really costs.
Let employers pay their employees what the market demands for their services, and let employees go to the marketplace and negotiate for the best health plans. If that results in a one-time increase in paychecks (and an equal offset to the employer’s health insurance costs), so be it. If employees have to spend their own dollars for health care insurance, they will pay much more attention the next time they go to a doctor’s office, or have that lab test, or check into a hospital. And most will start shopping for health care services like they might for a new car.
Likewise, if we must continue to endure the already bankrupt Medicare system, give the same ability to shop around to all Medicare recipients. Stop providing unlimited health care access with little or no responsibility on the part of the beneficiary. Like most other things in life, force retirees (or their children) to make some intelligent choices. Just like employees, force them to go to the market place and negotiate the best plans in the atmosphere of pure competition among service providers. Retirees managed to be smart enough to get to retirement. It wouldn’t take too many conversations with other elders, or articles in their AARP magazine, for them to figure out whether their current plan was the best one for them.
If we took out the free ride inherent in our current health care system for huge portions of our population, they would help us make the system vastly more efficient and effective. We’d see prices for health care decline almost overnight, and we’d see the incredible annual compounding of health care premiums approach the rate of inflation.
The free market mechanism of pure competition based on service levels and price is a great invention. We just need to apply it to our health care system.
August 26th, 2007 at 10:43 am
Thank you for the comments one and all. It is nice to see some people are concerned enough to submit comments. We haven’t solved anything but it’s a start.