Archive for the 'Dodd' Category

Obama, What Have You Done?

Posted in wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, Biden, Democrats, Gore, Kennedy, Clinton, hillary, Pelosi, Murtha, Reid, Edwards, Sen Dianne Feinstein, Sen Barbara Boxer, Bill Richardson, Dodd on June 6th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

Sen Barack ObamaWhat has Barack Obama done? He knows that, based on race, color or creed, not to mention a host of other demographic details, the race card is always available for counter-attack on anyone who expresses objections on an issue or proposes solutions that annoy the left. That’s right. If you have no substantive argument and therefore can only offer race card rebuttals, you are free to say whatever you want. Even if what you say is as racist as those you accuse of being that way.

On a radio program this morning, a talk show host and his guest were discussing this story. The question came up on why Obama is using this particular stand and why now? The guest answered that the left’s 43 year exploitation of civil rights issues as a manufactured wedge against the right is their standard approach. Use this emotional theme to gain support from those who feel ‘disenfranchised’. The left fringe including Hollywood celebrities and other guilt-laden rich employ public relations strategies of appearing concerned about the less fortunate to improve their status. Other less wealthy left-leaning ideologues find these false causes appealing to enhance their standing among certain groups.

The theory here would be that Obama realizes that his fears of losing a Presidential run were based on his lack of experience, any relevant history and only a weak campaign strategy of relying on his public speaking skills. He continues to worry about setting himself apart from other candidates without a convincing strategy or anything more than he has already presented. Obama knows he needs something more and he just doesn’t have it. This is real simple politics. So what do you do? Raise a fabricated issue and try to make it hot button. It must also be something only you can use. What better choice than the race card. Speak of Katrina, Rodney King and race riots.

DemsThe masks are coming off the Democratic candidates. Edwards is all about betting on trashing the troops as a winning strategy. Hillary Rodham Clinton is all about socialism and the impossible task of reinventing your deplorable personal history. And now Obama stoops low enough to use the race card as his central theme. The GOP may have their own demons to exorcise. But at least that possibility still exists. As a matter of fact, most voters can get a real sense of practical solutions and good old-fashioned American leadership in candidates like Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson. The lack of realistic criticism for these candidates causes opponents to reach for imaginary problems as their weapons. Those attacks are easily dispatched.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Obama fears frustrations will lead blacks to violence

Associated Press
Posted Wednesday, June 06, 2007
HAMPTON, Va. — Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Tuesday the Bush administration has done nothing to defuse a “quiet riot” among blacks that threatens to erupt just as riots in Los Angeles did 15 years ago.
The first-term Illinois senator said that with black people from New Orleans and the Gulf Coast still displaced 20 months after Hurricane Katrina, frustration and resentments are building explosively as they did before the 1992 riots.

Obama Would Lose Per Harris Poll

Posted in Announcement, wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, Biden, Democrats, News Media, Clinton, obama, Edwards, Bill Richardson, Dodd on June 5th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

Sen Barack ObamaAs much is said about Obama being on the heels of Dems leader Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Harris poll results below indicate he would have a tough time winning with only 1/3 of voters selecting him. How much better off can Clinton be if this is where Obama is? Polls never quite seem to be definitive, but they make a long campaign season more interesting and hopefully give the candidates a few sleepless nights. Hey, it’s not like they won’t do the same for us if they get elected.

You can view the whole thing at this link (CLICK HERE) because the poll report is a little bulky for this blog space. Not that it’s a huge report. Just one page but lots of tables.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

The Harris Poll ®#49, June 1, 2007

Just One-Third of U.S. Adults Would Vote for Barack Obama if He Was the Democratic Nominee for President

Three-quarters of African Americans Say They Would Vote for Him

If You Want Hillary, You’ll Get Bill

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, Democrats, liberal, Clinton, United States, hillary, Edwards, Dodd on June 4th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

Comrade HillryaAs we get closer to the bio release date of June 16, more pieces of the Bernstein book are teasingly offered. The snippet below is representative of the article at Reuters. Hillary Rodham Clinton is a mess. Her life’s a mess. Her history is a mess. Her dubious deeds still haunt her. And can you imagine being stuck in this time warp with Bill? Life probably couldn’t get much worse. And on top of that, anything that may have once made her Presidential material has long since faded.

The old line is the woman behind the successful man. Seems fair that Bill was successful at whatever it is he does long before he met Hillary. And if you give Hillary credit for Bill’s career, how about now? Hillary is being assisted by someone who has made it already, with or without her, and if she was instrumental in his career, why does she now need him to raise enough money? Can’t she do it on her own? This would give you a repeat indicator of what it would be like to have her in the White House. Because Bill would be pulling all the strings. And God knows what else.

Risky ThrowThe best part is damage control. All the Clinton crew could offer was a remark about the story being old news. That does not make it any less valid. In fact, since she is ‘currently’ a Presidential candidate the story is even more relevant than it was before. People need to be reminded of what has been so as not to relive history’s mistakes. And this blog is more than willing to help remind everyone. And the new stuff is even worse. Like socialist leaning ideology and risk taking that is not sensible for a President.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Hillary biography questions presidential prowess

Sun Jun 3, 2007 2:29PM EDT
The book also describes her deep fears that she would be indicted in the scandals involving her Whitewater land deal in Arkansas or the missing billing records from the law firm where she worked.
Bernstein sees Clinton as having lost much of the advocacy and genuineness that early in her career made her a passionate attorney and campaigner. Now, he says her tenure in the U.S. Senate has been “poll-driven, focus group-driven and devoid of controversy.”

Dems Debate: Conquest of Incompetence

Posted in Public Affairs, Health, Education, Iraq, wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, Biden, Democrats, News Media, Clinton, Afghanistan, North Korea, Nuke, Iran, obama, hillary, Pelosi, Edwards, Bill Richardson, Dodd on June 4th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

crossposted at:
Maggie’s Notebook | Conservative Blog

FaultlineUSA
Like you would expect anything of substance from a political debate. Maybe the Dems are so lame they can’t even get a debate choreographed well enough to hide their flaws. Maybe if they had gone on a Fox News debate things would have worked out better. So what are the high/low points?

The top priority each candidate gave for the first 100 days in office should be mentioned first. After all, look how Comrade Hillarywell the new Democratic majority has done with their 100 hour agenda. The only item that may make it into law any time soon is the pork barrel addition of the minimum wage raise in the Iraq war funding legislation.

Go figure, Comrade Clinton chose as her first 100 days top priority to bring home the troops from Iraq. In other words, Hillary Rodham Clinton’s first priority if elected President is to surrender.

ObamaObamarama may be mathematically challenged. Rather than a top priority he named two. Probably in answer to Edwards criticism of his health care offering and not to be outdone by Comrade Clinton, Obama picked surrendering in Iraq like Clinton and added health care to stick his tongue out at Edwards.

John EdwardsEdwards is almost as ‘out there’ as Kucinich. Edwards wants to ‘travel the world’ and ‘re-establish America’s moral authority.’ Who told Edwards we ever had moral authority. So is this one priority or two? Does he feel the need to travel and do the morality thing at the same time? Or is he liking the thought of Air Force One and some vacation time? It was bound to happen what with Air Pelosi and the rest all getting their own planes.

Chris DoddSurprisingly enough, Chris Dodd is the only one whose sound bite doesn’t seem to pander. Restore constitutional rights in this country. It is not completely clear what that is about or why he chose it. Did he mean to say constitutional? Or did he mean civil rights? At least he didn’t jump on the surrender bandwagon but the benefit to him for saying this is probably not a big help.

Kucinich and Gravel were about the war. Kucinich added getting rid of nukes. Thanks Dennis, we never would have thought of that one. Why isn’t your Peace and Non-violence Dept up and running yet? That would be a good job for them. (Kucinich and Gravel not pictured)

Bill RichardsonSen Joe Biden
Richardson wants to spend money and Biden is on the Iraq thing plus foreign affairs.

So they can’t count. They can’t select intelligent priorities. Children debate better. How anyone could vote for one of these incompetents is truly a puzzle. It is hard to believe there could be enough people voting for any one of these people for President that they would actually get elected. That is one scary thought. Ok, it’s two scary thoughts.

(source: This time, candidates don’t shy away from one another

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Another Dem candidate hires ‘nasty’ blogger

Posted in Technology, wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, Democrats, internet, blog, Clinton, obama, hillary, Edwards, Dodd on June 3rd, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

Sen Chris DoddYou can peruse the ‘evidence’ thru World Net Daily on this current report of more blogging woes for the Democratic Presidential field of candidates. So far Edwards has already had his net blunder. Hillary Rodham Clinton seems content with socialism and someone giving her a song for her campaign. Now Sen Chris Dodd appears ripe for a blogger controversy. And they say conservatives are behind the curve on having a net presence. Maybe the left believes if you are not way cool on the internet you are not a serious candidate. Ya, whatever.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Another Dem candidate hires ‘nasty’ blogger

After Edwards flap, White House-hopeful signs staffer with colorful Web trail
Posted: June 2, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern
Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn.
A little more than three months after profane, anti-Catholic writings led to the resignation of Sen. John Edwards’ campaign blogger, a man hired to head another Democratic presidential candidate’s Web enterprise is under scrutiny for his past Internet postings.

Matt Browner-Hamlin, the new official campaign blogger for Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, frequently used explicit language in scathing diatribes that vilified his political opponents, according to documentation by blogger Ian Schwartz.

Dodd Will Vote No on Iraq Bill

Posted in Iraq, war, wordpress, Politics, campaign, Afghanistan, Military, Dodd on May 24th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

DODD ANNOUNCES HE WILL VOTE “NO” ON IRAQ SUPPLEMENTAL BILL

For Immediate Release
May 23, 2007

Contact:
Christy Setzer
Cell - (860) 331-1913
Office - (202) 737-DODD (3633)
Bryan DeAngelis
Cell - (603) 726-1302
Office - (603) 668-DODD (3633)

Senator and Presidential candidate Chris Dodd today released the following statement on the latest Iraq supplemental bill:

“This war has gone on longer than World War II and there is no end in sight. Yet we are less secure and more isolated than before. We have lost 3,400 patriotic Americans and shattered our standing in the world. We are spending $2 billion a week - $8 billion a month - and are now caught in the middle of a civil war. Still, this President wants more of the same and this bill would give him his wish.

“I cannot and will not simply give this President another blank check.

“Half-measures and equivocations are not going to change our course in Iraq. If we are serious about ending the war, Congress must stand up to this President’s failed policy now - with clarity and conviction.

“As the debate on the war continues, I will continue to fight for a firm deadline that is tied to funding which will allow for a responsible redeployment of U.S. combat troops in Iraq - because that’s the only way to responsibly bring this war to a conclusion.

“I hope my colleagues would do the same.”