Comments on: Defenders of Socialized Medicine

by: Stanford Matthews

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:02:00 +0000

The ‘voices’ addressing constitutionality of ‘feddle gubmint’ actions in Congress, the White House and elsewhere have not garnered adequate public appeal to have an effect.

I would certainly support a continuous process within Congressional oversight dealing with this issue. However, I suspect the demand required to push such a trend is lost on the American voter.

Things being what they are as evidenced in August recess town halls, that may change soon.

by: David

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:49:33 +0000

BTW, slightly–though not completely–off topic from my previous comment, this:

http://media.causes.com/555066?p_id=60313119

by: David

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:48:09 +0000

Lost in all the public BS is the fact that no one–NO ONE–can point to anything in thew Constitution ennumerating a legitimate authority for “feddle gummint” meddling in the matter of health care provisions. But then, the fedgov already meddles in far, far more than it has constitutional authority to involve itself in. What’s one more unconstitutional law and its associated bureaucrappy?

by: Stanford Matthews

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:10:10 +0000

my answer is in the ASA and AARP post. You know, gotta conserve space and such now that AGW is all the rage…. (NOT)

by: Maggie Thornton

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:28:15 +0000

To say that Britain is among the worst for breast and prostate cancer survival is quite a statement. Your statement below is exactly right. Have you heard about the health care Wisconsin is having success with? It was on Greta.

If this is not in fact a liberal powerplay for more control over citizens then there is no reason to quickly pass legislation and enact laws to control healthcare. The current public debate is a good thing. Continuing with it until a consensus of citizens not leaders points the way to solutions is worthwhile.