Blog @ MoreWhat.com

If this is not your first time here you are aware that this blog absolutely opposes Hillary Rodham Clinton for President. To borrow a phrase she is not fit to be dog catcher. But whether you support or reject HRC, you may find the following excerpt useful for reviewing your position on the Presidential aspirations of Bill Clinton’s wife.

Hillary’s No Moral Conservative
Wed Nov 21, 3:00 AM ET

For decades now, the national media have insisted in each presidential election cycle that voters should ignore the liberal wizards hiding behind the curtain of the Democratic Party. Each plausible Democratic presidential contender is a “moderate” or “centrist,” be he Walter Mondale or Michael Dukakis or John Kerry. But now to describe Hillary Clinton as a “moral conservative” is so upside down and backward it sounds like … “This is your brain on drugs.”

If you have any problems with the policies or agendas of Hillary Rodham Clinton as described in the piece referenced above, then you likely oppose Clinton already. If you favor abortion and agree with everything demanded by the homosexual lobby and special interest groups you also favor Clinton. For those opposed to Clinton you must worry that she would push for pro-abortion law and policy as well as catering to every whim of the gay marriage advocates. If you favor Hillary Rodham Clinton’s positions on these issues you have to worry that it is just one more promise that will be forgotten if elected. Either way, pro or anti-Clinton, you have much to worry about if she is elected.

She and her husband had a flagship campaign promise to reform healthcare in 1992 and we all know how that worked out. She voted for the war in Iraq but now distances herself from that position not because of the war but because of her need to attract the far left for votes. One of her latest gaffes in the debates was the inability to take a coherent stand on whether or not illegals should be allowed to receive a driver’s license. Probably due to her inability to calculate which position would render the most votes.

Her current donor scandals continue to mount and combined with all the other scandal GATES on her record as well as covering up her White House docs as First Lady should be enough red flags and alarms to awaken the entire planet to her continued attempt to scam the public. So what is keeping you from understanding this woman is bad for America? Are you that blind or do you refuse to accept the facts?

Just today there is a report that HRC cherry-picked another issue to use for bashing the White House and President Bush. She picked a safe story of the rape victim in Saudi Arabia who is being further victimized by the society in which she lives. Why is HRC ragging at President Bush about it? What is he supposed to do, boycott Saudi oil? Ya, that’ll happen. Oil hovering around $100 a barrel, which is obscene, and the current addiction of the US for oil. Sure, the public will accept the President boycotting Saudi, or anyone’s oil to make a point. Not unless he wants civil unrest like we’ve never seen before. But the criticism works well for Hillary Rodham Clinton. She can score points with the weak-minded that somehow the US should make one individual’s unfortunate condition a matter of foreign policy.

Don’t you suspect that in most matters like these quiet channels are used to communicate expectations or wishes of the US to the ‘offending’ nation? But then with all HRC’s experience, she would know these things. Right.

This entry was posted on Friday, November 23rd, 2007 at 9:24 am and is filed under Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, campaign, Democrats, liberal, Clinton, hillary. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.