<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Movie</title>
	<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/</link>
	<description>To build consensus on issues</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Stanford Matthews</title>
		<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/#comment-19487</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/#comment-19487</guid>
					<description>C'mon Angel, you didn't really think that one half of the Democratic party's strongest 'brand' would merely fade away after losing the White House, did you?

Based on the outcome of the 2008 Presidential election alone it would seem reasonable to adjust the Dems' 'brand' idea such that Obama is now the most important with the mighty Clinton clan taking 2nd place or lower.

But with some members of the GOP as well as others commenting positively on the idea of HRC as SofS, the socialist movement in this country appears to be alive and whatever.

I just want to view the Hillary and Barack 'documentaries' from Citizens United but they are only available for purchase on DVD.  I need to send a complaint to the FEC as they caused the cancelling of a broadcast debut that was offered for the movies.

It could have been added to the controversy over ABC airing 'The Path to 9/11' which I found most compelling not to mention accurate.

Should this be included in a discussion of the Fairness Doctrine debate or is it a separate subject?  I suspect it is separate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon Angel, you didn&#8217;t really think that one half of the Democratic party&#8217;s strongest &#8216;brand&#8217; would merely fade away after losing the White House, did you?</p>
<p>Based on the outcome of the 2008 Presidential election alone it would seem reasonable to adjust the Dems&#8217; &#8216;brand&#8217; idea such that Obama is now the most important with the mighty Clinton clan taking 2nd place or lower.</p>
<p>But with some members of the GOP as well as others commenting positively on the idea of HRC as SofS, the socialist movement in this country appears to be alive and whatever.</p>
<p>I just want to view the Hillary and Barack &#8216;documentaries&#8217; from Citizens United but they are only available for purchase on DVD.  I need to send a complaint to the FEC as they caused the cancelling of a broadcast debut that was offered for the movies.</p>
<p>It could have been added to the controversy over ABC airing &#8216;The Path to 9/11&#8242; which I found most compelling not to mention accurate.</p>
<p>Should this be included in a discussion of the Fairness Doctrine debate or is it a separate subject?  I suspect it is separate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stanford Matthews</title>
		<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/#comment-19486</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/#comment-19486</guid>
					<description>Debbie, funny you bring that up cuz as it turns out I posted something in August 2007 borrowing on a theme from another site about Hillary and, go figure, nude photos that was a 'spoof'.  I had crossposted it to your site and to this day it gets a lot of hits.  A not so impressive commentary on the public interest.

But of course this time the HRC 'movie' post is simply a matter of a 'documentary' and an argument with the FEC on whether it serves as a campaign tool warranting a ban near elections as stated in the court records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debbie, funny you bring that up cuz as it turns out I posted something in August 2007 borrowing on a theme from another site about Hillary and, go figure, nude photos that was a &#8217;spoof&#8217;.  I had crossposted it to your site and to this day it gets a lot of hits.  A not so impressive commentary on the public interest.</p>
<p>But of course this time the HRC &#8216;movie&#8217; post is simply a matter of a &#8216;documentary&#8217; and an argument with the FEC on whether it serves as a campaign tool warranting a ban near elections as stated in the court records.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Angel</title>
		<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/#comment-19485</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/#comment-19485</guid>
					<description>oish!  I thought I would never have to hear Hillarys name again! :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oish!  I thought I would never have to hear Hillarys name again! <img src='http://morewhat.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/#comment-19484</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/hillary-movie/#comment-19484</guid>
					<description>Two words &quot;porno film&quot;... heh

I bet Hillary did not get an offer of $2 million to do a porn flick like Sarah Palin and her hubby did.  Or so I heard ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words &#8220;porno film&#8221;&#8230; heh</p>
<p>I bet Hillary did not get an offer of $2 million to do a porn flick like Sarah Palin and her hubby did.  Or so I heard &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

