Hillary Rodham Clinton Adopts Victim Ploy
Lauren Appelbaum is getting fooled by campaign theatrics or wants you to be. That is the theme set by her article referenced below. The logical response for Clinton would be to not look for the camera and keep the NH woman’s real estate problem out of the campaign. If Hillary Rodham Clinton was genuinely concerned about this woman’s situation, she would either facilitate a solution discretely or fund the bailout herself. The campaign ploy used by Clinton supplements her legislative proposal on predatory lending. But her stated reason for the proposal places all blame for the increase in foreclosures on the lender’s side of the equation. Again, a Democrat is creating victims of all borrowers and villains of all lenders.
The left has a habit of creating victims and villains as a tool to promote their agenda. On health care, all patients or potential patients, especially women and children, are the victims of health care while anyone associated with the provider side is the villain. In education it gets a little more complicated. When speaking in front of teachers or unions, increased pay is the main topic while education reform is omitted. When speaking to anyone else, reform is the main topic. Teachers as victims when speaking to unions, students as victims when talking in other venues. And of course, women’s rights is the victim if anyone opposes abortion on demand.
And the solutions for the victims created always involves spending taxpayer money or raising taxes or both. To solve issues for her chosen victims in foreclosure, Clinton suggest spending $1 Billion dollars. To solve infrastructure issues she created after an isolated incident of a structural bridge failure, Clinton proposes a $10 Billion solution. If you plan to upgrade every bridge in America over ten years, $10 billion would probably not be enough. If you are including anything else it certainly would be insufficient. And how did she select the $1 Billion or $10 Billion figures? What was that based on, a guess? In one week she has already suggested spending $11 Billion on two projects. How many weeks until the election? If elected, four to eight years is a lot of weeks. And a lot of money for victims, real and imagined.
Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com
Clinton on rising home foreclosures
From NBC’s Lauren Appelbaum
In a rare display of emotion, Clinton began her speech on rising home foreclosures this morning by imploring the audience and members of the media to help a New Hampshire woman who is losing her home.
“I don’t know whether there is anybody in this audience or anyone who through the media might be following this who can do anything to help Christy and her family, but I hope somebody will try,” Clinton said, in a softened, subdued voice. “The bank actually bought the home at higher than market value, so maybe if somebody with the bank, or with someone associated with Ameriquest, which started this downward spiral, could step forth and try to show some humanity and compassion. That would be a good way to start.”
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Jeanette’s Celebrity Corner, Right Truth, Inside the Northwest Territory, Shadowscope, Stuck On Stupid, Webloggin, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Conservative Thoughts, Allie Is Wired, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Wyvern dreams, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe
August 9th, 2007 at 8:57 pm
As Hillary discusses victims, perhaps she can discuss the victims of her own vaccine program in the 1990’s.
Those programs mandated that the newly born, babies and small children under two years of age were to be injected on numerous occasions with vaccine solutions which contained concentrations of mercury which were hundreds of times more concentrated than hazardous waste. Numerous programs were put into place to make certain that the children had the appropriate number of vaccines. They were quite aggressive in making sure the children got their recommended vaccines.
Only thing- they forgot to add up the mercury which was injected into the children through the vaccine protocol. The families are still dealing with the resultant damage caused by the vaccine program, even as government agencies, medical institutions and related healthcare entities work overtime to make certain that the citizenry fails to grasp the enormity of the error. Unfortunately, the government’s continued inaction in this area further harms the children as appropriate therapies (which can actually help the children and reverse some of the effects of the toxicity and resulting immune dysfunction) are not made available.
The vaccine program mandated that children were to be injected with vaccine solutions which had concentrations of mercury hundreds of times more concentrated than the EPA definition of hazardous waste. And no one wants to talk about this issue, even though it represents perhaps the most important healthcare issue in the history of modern medicine. Hillary unfortunately, won’t even raise this issue in her discussions of healthcare.
Inasmuch as many children and their families have been damaged by the government’s mandated vaccine programs and it is arguable that the aggressive approaches and programs for vaccinating the children were instituted by Hillary Clinton and her appointed or recommended minions during the Clinton administration, the families of damaged children wish to know from Ms. Clinton how she is to address these damaged children and the families suffering from this problem should she be elected.