<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Motors: Folly for the Masses</title>
	<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/</link>
	<description>To build consensus on issues</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Stanford Matthews</title>
		<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/#comment-20550</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/#comment-20550</guid>
					<description>One of Obama's chief geeks or nerds (apologies to geeks and nerds) is John P Holdren.  One of the opposing voices to things Holdren is Bjorn Lomborg. Like many other Obama selections he (Holdren) has an impressive curriculum vitae.  Lomborg also has an extensive resume'. He wrote a bestseller which has been vigorously challenged by others.

Bottom line is impressive credentials are fine. But that says nothing on how those tools are used.  After only a short time reading about the two above I am not convinced of anything.  Except that Obama would not pick anyone who did not share his agenda.  Therefore I suspect Holdren more than Lomborg.

You may find the nemes presented here useful in your own searches and reading on issues related to the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Obama&#8217;s chief geeks or nerds (apologies to geeks and nerds) is John P Holdren.  One of the opposing voices to things Holdren is Bjorn Lomborg. Like many other Obama selections he (Holdren) has an impressive curriculum vitae.  Lomborg also has an extensive resume&#8217;. He wrote a bestseller which has been vigorously challenged by others.</p>
<p>Bottom line is impressive credentials are fine. But that says nothing on how those tools are used.  After only a short time reading about the two above I am not convinced of anything.  Except that Obama would not pick anyone who did not share his agenda.  Therefore I suspect Holdren more than Lomborg.</p>
<p>You may find the nemes presented here useful in your own searches and reading on issues related to the environment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stanford Matthews</title>
		<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/#comment-20549</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/#comment-20549</guid>
					<description>The pic published iwth this post is the Chrysler Global Electric Motorcar. Acronym 'GEM'.  :-)

It was selected for fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pic published iwth this post is the Chrysler Global Electric Motorcar. Acronym &#8216;GEM&#8217;.  <img src='http://morewhat.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It was selected for fun.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Maggie Thornton</title>
		<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/#comment-20547</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 04:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/#comment-20547</guid>
					<description>Wait until people start dying on city streets in big number while driving these dressed-up golf carts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait until people start dying on city streets in big number while driving these dressed-up golf carts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Maggie Thornton</title>
		<link>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/#comment-20546</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 04:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://morewhat.com/wordpress/obama-motors-folly-for-the-masses/#comment-20546</guid>
					<description>I believe people would feel more positive about reducing emissions from autos if the global warming extremists were not shoving their folly down our throats.

We can all understand that autos have a big carbon footprint. The problem is: we now have the term &quot;carbon footprint&quot; in our vernacular, and it is infuriating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe people would feel more positive about reducing emissions from autos if the global warming extremists were not shoving their folly down our throats.</p>
<p>We can all understand that autos have a big carbon footprint. The problem is: we now have the term &#8220;carbon footprint&#8221; in our vernacular, and it is infuriating.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

