Comments on: Pick another woman besides Hillary Rodham Clinton

by: DragonLady

Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:25:16 +0000

Ann Coulter. LOL Ok, I only partly name her in jest. I seriously think we need someone who will lay it out there caustic style and drop all the feel-good PC bull****. Oh, wait. Ann’s a lawyer. Scratch that. Condi is too supportive of “Palestine” or else I could definitely support her.

Ok, my pick would be La Shawn Barber.

by: won't vote hillary

Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:14:33 +0000

How about Tipper Gore - she offers the same White House/Washington experience that Hillary does, plus the two-for-one deal with Al.

Just kidding…

On a more serious note, there are a lot of women who have held executive roles who would be better for the US than Mrs Clinton on the Democrat side: Christine Whitman and Carly Fiorina immediately come to mind. I also love the idea of a Maria Shriver candidacy even though I don’t think she’s ever held an office. Now there’s a two-for-one deal that would truly unite the parties.

Condoleeza Rice would be an amazing Republican candidate. I wish I knew why she isn’t running. Hopefully someone will tap her for VP.

by: Stanford Matthews

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:50:10 +0000

Rockyspoon, the post simply requested women to pick another woman candidate for President. It might be interesting to see what other female candidate women would like to have.

by: jacob larson

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:58:08 +0000

Condoleezza Rice should run for president! For two reasons: #1 she’s intelligent AND articulate! #2 she’s not Hillary!

by: Rockyspoon

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:42:46 +0000

Why should it be a requirement that there be a “female substitute” in the presidential race? Have gender quotas gone that far now??

by: Stanford Matthews

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:00:28 +0000

C’mon Audrey, give us a femaile substitute for Hillary Rodham Clinton in a Presidential race.

by: Audrey

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:17:55 +0000

Hillary terrifies me. I am so concerned the “soccer moms” will vote for her due to “feel good” messages about children and because she is a women. Not knowing she leans towards socialsm.