Sagging Hillary
Hillary Rodham Clinton’s sagging campaign needs no push from those who oppose her. She is destroying whatever chance she may have had all by herself. Rather than draw attention to her lack of any substantial accomplishments it may have been a good idea to skip opening her mouth on NPR this morning. Interesting how Clinton criticizes her lack of experience rivals as she ‘cites her work on’… work on exactly what? Vague references to an assortment of health related items that only serve to remind the electorate of her failed attempt at health care reform during her husband’s first term as President. Gotta hand it to slick Willie. Health care was the flagship issue of the first Clinton campaign. So he gives it to his First Lady wife to handle. Probably knowing it was a suicide mission. She takes it, gets her butt kicked and now in the middle of a Presidential campaign keeps reminding people of her failure. And all the while Bill keeps it off his resume’. Bill, you could have kissed her first.
Now when asked about her chances in the campaign, Senator ‘do nothing’ Hillary Rodham Clinton states that she is in the race through Super Tuesday. What happened to the opening mantra of her campaign that ‘we’re in it to win’? A little political reality setting in perhaps?
Gee Wally, if Ted Kennedy and the Democratic party elite chose to anoint Kerry after Iowa in 04, how come they haven’t anointed HRC for 08? Rove was right. Hillary winning the Dems nomination would be the easiest competition for the GOP in a general. Ya, Iowa was but one contest. Seems a bit unrealistic to expect HRC to win NH. But go ahead and nominate her anyway. Now that the inevitability factor has been snuffed. Nominate HRC.


January 7th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
A little humor from the Daily Herald on a serious point…..
Something doesn’t add up this election year
By Chuck Goudie
Either Hillary Rodham flunked math class at Maine South High School in Park Ridge or she picked up Jethro-style ciphering during her years in Arkansas.
How else would you explain Sen. Rodham-Clinton’s repeated statement that she has decades of experience? Unless she is figuring her Senate time in dog years, I’m not sure how she arrives at “35 years of experience.”
http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=108142