Secretary of State Clinton Sets Up Chinagate II
So much changes and so much stays the same. While visions of Chinagate danced in her head. Hillary Rodham Clinton figured the scandal was dead. Opponents claim with evidence to support. Obama is a third Clinton term with more espionage to thwart. Right outta the Gates warning of preparedness with who flung poo, Clinton seeks more with China as if selling secrets is not taboo.
A Clinton Administration via President Obama is not a suggestion off the mark based on staffing since The One assumed office. A little background refresher of only one chapter from the Clinton book of scandals raises serious questions about a new Secretary of State focusing on China after Chinagate.
Try to make the argument that this is not something about which we should be concerned. For those of you who voted for Clinton and/or Obama in the 2008 campaign and/or election, did you consider this before entering the voting booth, mailing your ballot, doing the driveby or letting ACORN vote for you?
There are reports available suggesting President Clinton supported transferring sensitive technology as a method to insure no single nation had military dominance over the others. Liberals are a nightmare even terrorists could appreciate…… and do.
Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com
For the lazy among you…..
The Idiot’s Guide to Chinagate (from Newsmax)

A face only an anarchist could love.
Secretary of State Clinton Calls for Comprehensive US-China Dialogue |
|
27 January 2009 |
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called for a “comprehensive dialogue” with China, extending beyond economic issues.
Secretary Clinton Tuesday said U.S. economic problems mean that people are losing jobs not only in America but also in China. So Clinton said that while the economy will always be a centerpiece of the U.S. relationship with China, the new U.S. administration wants it to be part of a broader agenda.
She said the Bush administration turned the strategic dialogue with China into an economic one.
Clinton did not mention what other issues she would bring up with the government in Beijing.
Human rights activists have called for renewed U.S. pressure on China to improve its human rights record and freedom of expression.
The French news agency said groups such as Amnesty International and Reporters Without Borders, and veteran Chinese dissident Harry Wu expressed hope at a U.S. congressional hearing Tuesday that President Barack Obama will give China’s human rights problem a high priority.
The Associated Press quoted Defense Secretary Robert Gates as telling a Senate hearing Tuesday that the United States is ready to handle any foreseeable military threat from China.
Some information for this report was provided by AFP, AP and Reuters.
Trackposted to Rosemary’s Thoughts, Allie is Wired, third world county, Political Byline, The World According to Carl, DragonLady’s World, Wingless - Cuba: Beautiful Country, People…Not so Beautiful System…, Rosemary’s News and Ideas, Conservative Cat, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

January 29th, 2009 at 11:12 pm
A face only an anarchist could love…and that they do!
January 30th, 2009 at 12:16 am
And I thought no one would notice my minor use of artistic license on the Queen of Cringe.
January 30th, 2009 at 11:54 am
Lawsuit filed claiming Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve
There were serious questions about the constitutional eligibility of Hillary Clinton to serve as secretary of State. The issue arises from a vote held to raise the Secretary of States salary. Senator Hillary Clinton voted for this increase. The Constitution forbids members of the Senate from being appointed to civil office, such as the Secretary of State, if the “emoluments,” or salary and benefits, of the office were increased during the Senator’s term.
January 30th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
The text below is a copy/paste of my comment submitted at the Intellectual Redneck and a thank you for the relevant trackback. Nice job IR
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/2002/inelhall.htm
The link above is an example of what one can easily find on this topic with a simple search. The references to US code may be helpful. But the point is there is likely more at issue than the ineligibility clause itself. Much has occurred since the Constitution was written which may alter the interpretation in the present and render the Judicial Watch case an exercise in futility.
Personally I would find a successful outcome to the suit very satisfying. And even though a case like the lawsuit(s) filed challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility for the Office of President of the United States presented another tantalizing prospect a simple rejection based on standing as viewed by SCOTUS suggests a similar outcome with regard to HRC and the ineligibility clause.
But we can always ‘hope’ for a ‘change’ that would retire the Queen of Cringe.
As a parting note, it is refreshing to receive a trackback that is relevant. Thanks to the Intellectual Redneck for a heads up on this topic.
January 30, 2009 11:46 AM
January 31st, 2009 at 11:37 am
Do you remember the Cox Report? The Temple (with the Monks)? Sandy Berg(la)ur? Health care that would take over 1/7th of the economy? They seem to be right on schedule as far as pushing this through, too. OVER MY FREE DEAD BODY! Well, over my free body anyway.
We are growing so apart in this country, I wouldn’t be surprised if we were headed for another civil war. Only this time it would be to throw off the gov’t. Oh wait a minute. Didn’t we already do that? *sigh*
January 31st, 2009 at 11:39 am
Um…I have 3:38 am. What’s up with your clock? Are you in England or something? lol
January 31st, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Civil war seems a little over the top. I’m more concerned about weakening defense than gov’t run health
You asked me that once before. Time on this site is set to UTC or GMT, ya, England but I’m not there.